<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="2" id="246">
 <title>quantum `paradoxes'</title>
 <name>QuantumSmarandacheQuasiParadoxes</name>
 <created>2007-04-05 16:02:48</created>
 <modified>2009-01-16 11:23:46</modified>
 <type>Topic</type>
<parent id="368">Quantum Paradoxes and Bell's inequalities</parent>
 <creator id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <modifier id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <author id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <author id="284" name="nick"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03.65.Ud"/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="42.50.Dv"/>
 </classification>
 <keywords>
	<term>paradox</term>
	<term>Sorites paradox</term>
	<term>quantum paradox</term>
 </keywords>
 <preamble>% this is the default PlanetPhysics preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here</preamble>
 <content>\section{Quantum Paradoxes}

A \emph{paradox} is a statement which has either an apparent or a real self-inconsistency (such as ``A and non-A''), thus contradicing the logical principle of excluded third (`tertium non datur')

In the early stages of quantum theory development both Schr\"odinger and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen have suggested that there are two distinct quantum paradoxes: 
 1. The `Schr\"odinger cat'' paradox in a thought (or `gedanken') experiment
that supposedly shows that a ``cat is neither alive nor dead'' but in a
superposition of the the `live' and `dead' states. A related version of this `paradox' is the two-slit experiment in which, for example, `an electron passes through two slits at the same time, thus interferring with itself and resulting in a diffraction pattern at the detector behind the two slits'; however, if the
electron position is determined before reaching the two slits the diffraction pattern, of course, disappears, as only one electron possible state exists--that
which was already measured or observed. 

 The wave-particle duality proposed by Louis deBroglie, and readily accepted by Albert Einstein, is thought to remove this type of quantum `paradox', although it simply shifts the argument to the quantum logic realm where quantum micro-entitites such as an electron or any other quantum `particle' can simultaneously
possess an associated wave (or `character'); the existence of the associated wave of a quantum particle was later elaborated in quantum field theories (QFT)
in the form of `virtual photons' that mediate the electromagnetic interactions
between charged quantum particles such as electrons, protons, ions, etc. 


 2. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (or EPR) `paradox' is a thought experiment that reveals the non-local character of quantum theory, and was presented initially
as `proof that Quantum  Mechanics' is incomplete, because quantum non-locality was proposed to contradict both Special and General Relativity theories.


\textbf{Note}
 On the other hand, more recently proposed `quantum quasi-paradoxes' and `Sorite paradoxes' are claimed to be based on a wide-range of other apparent antinomies that are not found in any standard Quantum Mechanics textbooks. 

\begin{thebibliography}{9}

\bibitem{Weisstein} Weisstein, E. W., \htmladdnormallink{Quasi-Paradox}{http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SmarandacheParadox.html},  
CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p. 1661, (1998).
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
