<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="6" id="368">
 <title>Quantum Paradoxes and Bell's inequalities</title>
 <name>QuantumParadoxesAndBellsInequalities</name>
 <created>2009-01-10 18:35:36</created>
 <modified>2009-02-19 09:09:43</modified>
 <type>Topic</type>
 <creator id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <modifier id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <author id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03."/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="03.65.Fd"/>
 </classification>
 <preamble>% this is the default PlanetPhysics preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here</preamble>
 <content>The following is a contributed topic on known quantum paradoxes
(but no `quasi-paradoxes', please!)

\subsection{Quantum Paradoxes and Bell's Inequalities}

There are two major known quantum `paradoxes':

\begin{enumerate}
 \item The Scr\"odinger's cat paradox, often expressed as the ``Scr\"odinger's cat is neither dead nor alive'', but in fact meaning something quite different;

 \item The \PMlinkexternal{EPR `Paradox'}{http://planetphysics.org/?op=getobj&amp;from=lec&amp;id=119}; several solutions of the EPR `paradox' have
been produced: 

 1. Interpretations of experiments with polarized laser beams  
favor nonlocality in quantum systems and in the known, physical Universe thus suggesting that the assumptions of the EPR paper are the problem and that there is no paradox; 
 
 2.  An \PMlinkexternal{Unified Local Field Theory (ULFT)}{http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0102101} also claims to solve 
the EPR `paradox' by assuming locality--which obviously conflicts the polarized
laser beam experiments' interpretations. 


\end{enumerate}

\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{[1]} 
Einstein A., Podolsky B. and Rosen N. Phys. Rev. 47, p.777 (1935)

\bibitem{[2] BJS65} 
Bell, J.S. Physics, 1, p. 195 (1965).

\bibitem{AL2k2}
A. Laudlau. 2002. Apeiron, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2002 37. Roy Keys Inc.

\bibitem{[3]}
Clauser J. and Horne M. Detector Inefficiencies in the EPR experiment.
Phys. Rev. D 35 (12) 3831--3835 (1987).

\bibitem{[4]}
Vaidman L. Tests of Bell Inequalities $quant-ph/0107057$ (2001).

\bibitem{[[5]} 
Aspect A., Grangier P. and Roger B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804--1807
(1982)

\bibitem{[6]} 
Scarani V., Tittel W., Zbinden H., Gisin N. $quant-ph/0007008$ Phys. Lett.
A 276 2000 1-7 (2000)

\bibitem{[7]}
Ou, Z.Y., Pereira S.F., Kimble H.J. and Peng K.C. Phys Rev. Lett. 68,
3663 (1992)

\bibitem{[8]} 
Percival, I.C. Physical Letters., A 244 (6) pp. 495-501 (1998).

\bibitem{[9]} Smoot G. Detection of Anisotropy in the Cosmic Blackbody Radiation. Physical Review Letters 39 14 p898 (1977).

\bibitem{[10]}
Peebles, P.J.E. and Wilkinson D.T. Phys. Rev. 174 2168 (1968).

\bibitem{[11]}
Longair, M.S. The Physics of Background Radiation. The Deep Universe.
Springer Verlag (1995)

\bibitem{[12]}
Weinberg, S. The First Three Minutes. Basic Books. pp.71-72. (1977).

\bibitem{[13]}
Dirac P.A.M. The Theory of the electron (parts 1 and 2). Proceedings of
the Royal Society in London. A117, p610 and A118, p.351 (1928)

\bibitem{[14]}
 Breit G. An interpretation of Dirac’s Theory of the electron. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 14 p.553 (1928)

\bibitem{[15]}
 Schroedinger. E. Sitzungsberichte Berlin Akadamie, p.418 (1930).

\bibitem{[16]} Dirac P.A.M. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford. p263. (1958)

\bibitem{[17]}
Messiah A. Quantum Mechanics. Vols. 1 and 2., vol.2: Ch XX, pp.922--925.

\bibitem{[18]}
Bohm D. The Special Theory of Relativity. pp23--25. (1996)

\bibitem{[19]}
Hafele J. and Keating R. Science, 177 p.166 (1972).

\bibitem{[20]}
Kundig W. Phys Rev. 129, 2371 (1963)

\bibitem{[21]}
Ives H. and Stillwell. Journal of the Optical Society of America.m 28 pp.
215-226 (1938) and 31 p369 (1941)

\bibitem{[22]}
Konopinski E.J. Electromagnetic fields and Relativistic particles
McGraw Hill p315-319 (1981)

\bibitem{[23]}
Poynting J.H. Phil. Trans. 175 p343-361 (1884)

\bibitem{[24]}
Bohm D. and Hiley B. The Undivided Universe: an ontological
interpretation of quantum mechanics. Routledge. pp288-292 (1993).

\bibitem{[25]}
Teller, P. An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Ch 7
(1995).

\bibitem{[26]}
Cui, H.Y. Direction Adaptation Nature of Coulomb’s Force and
Gravitational Force in 4-Dimensional Space-time physics/0102073
(2001).

\bibitem{[27]}
 Cui, H.Y. Method for Deriving the Dirac Equation from the Relativistic
Newton’s Second Law quant-ph/0102114 (2001).

\bibitem{[28]}
 Redhead, M. Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism. Oxford University
Press (1987).

\bibitem{[29]}
 Rembielinski, J. Superluminal Phenomena and the Quantum Preferred
Frame quant-ph/0010026 (2000).

\bibitem{[30]}
Konopinskim E. J. Electromagnetic Fields and Relativistic Particles.
Mcgraw Hill pp 441-454 (1981).

\bibitem{[31]}
 d’Espagnat, B. A note on measurement. quant-ph/0101141 (2001).

\bibitem{[32]}
 Wang, L.J., Kuzmich A., Dogariu A. Nature 406 pp 277-279 (2000).

\bibitem{[33]} 
Olkhovsky V. S., Recami E. and Salesi G. Superluminal effects for
quantum tunnelling through TWO successive barriers quant-ph 0002022
v4 (2001).

\bibitem{[34]} 
Chernitskii A.A. Concept of Unified Local Field Theory and Nonlocality
of Matter $quant-ph/0102101$ (2001).

\bibitem{[35]}
Van Flandern T. The Speed of Gravity--What the Experiments Say.
Physics Letters A, 250 1--11 (1998).
\end{thebibliography}</content>
</record>
