<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<record version="8" id="442">
 <title>automaton</title>
 <name>Automaton2</name>
 <created>2009-01-27 23:28:46</created>
 <modified>2009-02-26 11:05:50</modified>
 <type>Definition</type>
 <creator id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <modifier id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <author id="441" name="bci1"/>
 <classification>
	<category scheme="msc" code="00."/>
	<category scheme="msc" code="02."/>
 </classification>
 <defines>
	<concept>stable automaton</concept>
	<concept>state space</concept>
	<concept>transition function</concept>
	<concept>clasical automaton</concept>
	<concept>sequential machine</concept>
	<concept>output function</concept>
 </defines>
 <synonyms>
	<synonym concept="automaton" alias="classical automaton"/>
	<synonym concept="automaton" alias="sequential machine"/>
 </synonyms>
 <related>
	<object name="CategoryOfAutomata"/>
 </related>
 <preamble>% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% define commands here
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsfonts, amsthm, amscd, enumerate}
\usepackage{xypic, xspace}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
\usepackage[curve]{xy}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in}
\setlength{\textheight}{9.0in}
\voffset=-.4in
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}[section]
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}[section]
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}[section]
\newtheorem{example}{Example}[section]
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}[section]
\newtheorem*{notation}{Notation}
\newtheorem*{claim}{Claim}
\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\ensuremath{\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\newcommand{\Ad}{{\rm Ad}}
\newcommand{\Aut}{{\rm Aut}}
\newcommand{\Cl}{{\rm Cl}}
\newcommand{\Co}{{\rm Co}}
\newcommand{\DES}{{\rm DES}}
\newcommand{\Diff}{{\rm Diff}}
\newcommand{\Dom}{{\rm Dom}}
\newcommand{\Hol}{{\rm Hol}}
\newcommand{\Mon}{{\rm Mon}}
\newcommand{\Hom}{{\rm Hom}}
\newcommand{\Ker}{{\rm Ker}}
\newcommand{\Ind}{{\rm Ind}}
\newcommand{\IM}{{\rm Im}}
\newcommand{\Is}{{\rm Is}}
\newcommand{\ID}{{\rm id}}
\newcommand{\grpL}{{\rm GL}}
\newcommand{\Iso}{{\rm Iso}}
\newcommand{\rO}{{\rm O}}
\newcommand{\Sem}{{\rm Sem}}
\newcommand{\SL}{{\rm Sl}}
\newcommand{\St}{{\rm St}}
\newcommand{\Sym}{{\rm Sym}}
\newcommand{\Symb}{{\rm Symb}}
\newcommand{\SU}{{\rm SU}}
\newcommand{\Tor}{{\rm Tor}}
\newcommand{\U}{{\rm U}}
\newcommand{\A}{\mathcal A}
\newcommand{\Ce}{\mathcal C}
\newcommand{\E}{\mathcal E}
\newcommand{\F}{\mathcal F}
%\newcommand{\grp}{\mathcal G}
\renewcommand{\H}{\mathcal H}
\renewcommand{\cL}{\mathcal L}
\newcommand{\Q}{\mathcal Q}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathcal R}
\newcommand{\cS}{\mathcal S}
\newcommand{\cU}{\mathcal U}
\newcommand{\W}{\mathcal W}
\newcommand{\bA}{\mathbb{A}}
\newcommand{\bB}{\mathbb{B}}
\newcommand{\bC}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\bD}{\mathbb{D}}
\newcommand{\bE}{\mathbb{E}}
\newcommand{\bF}{\mathbb{F}}
\newcommand{\bG}{\mathbb{G}}
\newcommand{\bK}{\mathbb{K}}
\newcommand{\bM}{\mathbb{M}}
\newcommand{\bN}{\mathbb{N}}
\newcommand{\bO}{\mathbb{O}}
\newcommand{\bP}{\mathbb{P}}
\newcommand{\bR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\bV}{\mathbb{V}}
\newcommand{\bZ}{\mathbb{Z}}
\newcommand{\bfE}{\mathbf{E}}
\newcommand{\bfX}{\mathbf{X}}
\newcommand{\bfY}{\mathbf{Y}}
\newcommand{\bfZ}{\mathbf{Z}}
\renewcommand{\O}{\Omega}
\renewcommand{\o}{\omega}
\newcommand{\vp}{\varphi}
\newcommand{\vep}{\varepsilon}
\newcommand{\diag}{{\rm diag}}
\newcommand{\grp}{\mathcal G}
\newcommand{\dgrp}{{\mathsf{D}}}
\newcommand{\desp}{{\mathsf{D}^{\rm{es}}}}
\newcommand{\hgr}{{\mathsf{H}}}
\newcommand{\mgr}{{\mathsf{M}}}
\newcommand{\ob}{{\rm Ob}}
\newcommand{\obg}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{G)}}}
\newcommand{\obgp}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{G}')}}
\newcommand{\obh}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{H})}}
\newcommand{\Osmooth}{{\Omega^{\infty}(X,*)}}
\newcommand{\grphomotop}{{\rho_2^{\square}}}
\newcommand{\grpcalp}{{\mathsf{G}(\mathcal P)}}
\newcommand{\rf}{{R_{\mathcal F}}}
\newcommand{\grplob}{{\rm glob}}
\newcommand{\loc}{{\rm loc}}
\newcommand{\TOP}{{\rm TOP}}
\newcommand{\wti}{\widetilde}
\newcommand{\what}{\widehat}
\renewcommand{\a}{\alpha}
\newcommand{\be}{\beta}
\newcommand{\de}{\delta}
\newcommand{\del}{\partial}
\newcommand{\ka}{\kappa}
\newcommand{\si}{\sigma}
\newcommand{\ta}{\tau}
\newcommand{\lra}{{\longrightarrow}}
\newcommand{\ra}{{\rightarrow}}
\newcommand{\rat}{{\rightarrowtail}}
\newcommand{\ovset}[1]{\overset {#1}{\ra}}
\newcommand{\ovsetl}[1]{\overset {#1}{\lra}}</preamble>
 <content>\begin{definition}
A {\em classical automaton, s-automaton} $\A$, (or sequential machine) is defined as a quintuple of sets, $I$,$O$ and $S$, and set-theoretical mappings,

$$(I, O, S, \delta: I \times S \rightarrow S; \lambda: S \times S \rightarrow O),$$

where $I$ is the set of s-automaton inputs, $S$ is the set of states (or the state space of the s-automaton), $O$ is the set of s-automaton outputs, $\delta$ is the {\em transition function} that maps a s-automaton state $s_j$ onto its next state $s_{j+1}$ in response to a specific s-automaton input $j \in I$, and $\lambda$ is the \emph{output function} that maps couples of consecutive (or sequential) s-automaton states $(s_i, s_{i+1})$ onto s-automaton outputs $o_{i+1}$ 
($(s_i, s_{i+1}) \mapsto o_{i+1}$, hence the older name of sequential machine for an s-automaton).
\end{definition}

\begin{definition}
 A categorical automaton can also be defined by a commutative square diagram containing all of the above components.

\end{definition}

 With the above automaton definition(s) one can now also define morphisms between automata and their composition.

\begin{definition} A \emph{homomorphism of automata} or {\em automata homomorphism} is a morphism of automata quintuples that preserves commutativity of the set-theoretical mapping compositions of both the transition
function $\delta$ and the output function $\lambda$. 
\end{definition}

 With the above two definitions one now has sufficient data to define the category of automata
and automata homomorphisms.
 
\begin{definition}
 A \emph{category of automata} is defined as a category of quintuples
$(I, O, X, \delta: I \times X \rightarrow X; \lambda: X \times S \rightarrow O)$ and
automata homomorphisms $h:{\A}_i \rightarrow {\A}_j$,
such that these homomorphisms commute with both the transition and the output functions of any automata ${\A}_i$ and ${\A}_j$.
\end{definition}

\textbf{Remarks:} 
\begin{enumerate}
\item \emph{Automata homomorphisms} can be considered also as automata transformations
or as semigroup homomorphisms, when the state space, $X$, of the automaton is defined
as a \emph{semigroup} $S$. 

\item Abstract automata have numerous realizations in the real world as : machines, robots, devices,
computers, supercomputers, always considered as \emph{discrete} state space sequential machines.\\
\item Fuzzy or analog devices are not included as standard automata.
\item Similarly, \emph{variable (transition function)} automata are not included, but Universal Turing machines are.
\end{enumerate}

\begin{definition} An alternative definition of an automaton is also in use:
as a five-tuple $(S, \Sigma, \delta, I, F)$, where $\Sigma$ is a non-empty set of symbols
$\alpha$ such that one can define a {\em configuration} of the automaton as a couple
$(s,\alpha)$ of a state $s \in S $ and a symbol $\alpha \in \Sigma $. Then $\delta$
defines a ``next-state relation, or a transition relation'' which associates to each configuration
$(s, \alpha)$ a subset $\delta (s,\alpha)$ of S- the state space of the automaton.
With this formal automaton definition, the \emph{category of abstract automata} can be defined by specifying automata homomorphisms in terms of the morphisms between five-tuples representing such abstract automata.
\end{definition}


\begin{example} A special case of automaton is that of a {\em stable automaton} when all its state transitions are {\em reversible}; then its state space can be seen to possess a groupoid (algebraic) structure. The {\em category of reversible automata} is then a 2-category, and also a subcategory of the 2-category of groupoids, or the groupoid category.  
\end{example}

\begin{definition} An alternative definition of an automaton is also in use:
as a five-tuple $(S, \Sigma, \delta, I, F)$, where $\Sigma$ is a non-empty set of symbols
$\alpha$ such that one can define a {\em configuration} of the automaton as a couple
$(s,\alpha)$ of a state $s \in S $ and a symbol $\alpha \in \Sigma $. Then $\delta$
defines a ``next-state relation, or a transition relation'' which associates to each configuration
$(s, \alpha)$ a subset $\delta (s,\alpha)$ of S- the state space of the automaton.
With this formal automaton definition, the \emph{category of abstract automata} can be defined by specifying automata homomorphisms in terms of the morphisms between five-tuples representing such abstract automata.
\end{definition}


 \begin{example} 

 A special case of automaton is that of a {\em stable automaton} when all its state transitions are {\em reversible}; then its state space can be seen to possess a groupoid (algebraic) structure. The {\em category of reversible automata} is then a 2-category, and also a subcategory of the 2-category of groupoids, or the groupoid category.
 \end{example}</content>
</record>
